
Catholic Teaching
Catholics care about the sanctity of life because the entire purpose of each soul God endows with life is to find its way back to God by loving God and caring for all the souls God has placed around it. Voluntary termination of life any time between conception and natural death necessarily frustrates that purpose.
The source of human dignity is the likeness to God that is bestowed on each of us at the moment we are conceived. We respond appropriately to this gift by using all the time, talent, and treasure that God has entrusted to us to seek and grow closer to God, by sharing in His continuing act of creation and caring for those around us. Our first purpose is to seek God, especially in one another. If we do that, everything else will be given to us. Anything that interferes with that is contrary to the Word of God. Genesis chapter 1; Matthew chapters 6, 22 & 25
Abortion & Euthanasia
“You shall not kill.”
– the 5th Commandmenthere
The right to life from conception to natural death is the foundation of all Catholic Social Teaching, and in particular, implies the illicitness of every form of procured abortion and of euthanasia. – 155, Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church
“This is not something subject to alleged reforms or ‘modernizations.’ It is not ‘progressive’ to try to resolve problems by eliminating a human life. Who can remain unmoved before such painful situations?”
– Pope Francis, Evangelii Gaudium 214
Human Engineering
Cloning and Cell Manipulation
An issue of particular social and cultural significance today, because of its many and serious moral implications, is human cloning… the simple replication of normal cells or of a portion of DNA presents no particular ethical problem. Very different, however, is cloning understood in the proper sense. Such cloning is contrary to the dignity of human procreation because it takes place in total absence of an act of personal love between spouses, being agamic and asexual reproduction. In the second place, this type of reproduction represents a form of total domination over the reproduced individual on the part of the one reproducing it…
Cloning for therapeutic use does not attenuate its moral gravity, because in order that such cells may be removed the embryo must first be created and then destroyed. 236, Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church
Gender Election
Everyone, man and woman, should acknowledge and accept his sexual identity. Physical, moral and spiritual difference and complementarities are oriented towards the goods of marriage and the flourishing of family life. -224 Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church
Men and women with homosexual tendencies must be accepted with respect, compassion, and sensitivity. Every sign of unjust discrimination in their regard should be avoided. – 358 Catechism of the Catholic Church
Population Growth; Birth Control; Family Planning
Judgment concerning the interval of time between births, and that regarding the number of children, belongs to the spouses alone. This is one of their inalienable rights, to be exercised before God… The intervention of public authorities must be made in a way that fully respects the freedom of the couple. All programmes of economic assistance aimed at financing campaigns of sterilization and contraception are to be morally condemned as affronts to the dignity of the person and the family.
The answer to questions connected with population growth must instead by sought in simultaneous respect both of sexual morals and of social ethics, promoting greater justice and authentic solidarity so that dignity is given to life in all circumstances.
All reproductive techniques — such as the donation of sperm or ova, surrogate motherhood, heterologous artificial fertilization — that make use of the uterus of another woman or of gametes of persons other than the married couple, injuring the right of the child to be born of one father and one mother who are father and mother are ethically unacceptable both from a biological and from a legal point of view. – 234-235, Compendium of the Social Doctrine of the Church

Abortion
The party advocates:
– expanding the number of abortion clinics within the province, since all but one are currently located in the GTA or Ottawa.
– ensuring that abortion clinics in Ontario are fully funded.
Socially Assisted Death
As part of a plan to expand care options for people with complex needs, the party advocates recognizing suicide as a public health priority and investing in evidence-based prevention strategies that support the individual needs of people, including Indigenous and 2SLGBTQIA+ communities.
Human Engineering
Gender election
To strengthen in-school learning, the party advocates:
– establishing clearly visible all-gender washrooms and updating school communications to become more gender inclusive, recognising that gender exists on a spectrum.
– updating the curriculum to include informed discussions of 2SLGBTQIA+ prejudice.
The party has published no official statement concerning its policies regarding:
– population growth, birth control, or family planning

The party has made no current official statement regarding its policies concerning:
– abortion, euthanasia or alternatives.
– human engineering.
– contraception or population control.
Abortion & Alternatives for Mothers & Children
Prior to the previous election, the party stated that:
– during its prior term in office it made the abortion pill available at no charge and passed legislation to make sure Ontario women can access abortion services without fear of intimidation, harassment or interference.
– women’s reproductive rights are at risk from those who don’t believe women have the right to make decisions about their own health care.
At that time the party advocated:
– protecting and maintaining the publicly funded abortion services and reproductive health care programs currently available in Ontario.
Socially Assisted Death (SAD)
Prior to the previous election, the party stated that:
– creating 30,000 new long-term beds over 10 years to improve community care, investing in mental health, addiction, rehab and dementia care, palliative and end-of-life care.
Population Growth, Birth Control, Family Planning
The party states that during its prior term in office it:
– invested in programs to support moms and families, including the first publicly funded in-vitro fertilization program in Ontario, which has supported at least 27,000 families.
– expanded access to midwifery services across the province, launched Canada’s first fetal treatment centre, and provided free prescription drugs to women under 25, including birth control.

Abortion & Alternatives for Mothers & Children
As part of its proposal for promoting public health care, the party advocates:
– expanding OHIP to include coverage for prescription contraception, the HPV vaccine at any age when recommended by a doctor, PrEP and PEP, and take-home cervical cancer test kits.
To promote public health care, the party advocates:
– working with experts, health care providers, patients and communities to ensure access to gender affirming care and breaking down barriers to accessing health care for all 2SLGBTQ+ Ontarians.
Assisted Suicide
To ensure that every Ontarian has access to compassionate, dignified, and quality end-of-life care, the party advocates:
– expanding the province’s network of hospices and working with community care providers to establish a compassionate and accessible palliative care system; ensuring that every Ontarian who seeks access to medical assistance in dying receives it; and ensuring that terminally ill children and their families are provided with accessible and supportive end-of-life care.
End of Life Care
To ensure that every Ontarian has access to compassionate, dignified, and quality end-of-life care, the party advocates:
– expanding the province’s network of hospices and working with community care providers to establish a compassionate and accessible palliative care system; ensuring that every Ontarian who seeks access to medical assistance in dying receives it; and ensuring that terminally ill children and their families are provided with accessible and supportive end-of-life care.
Human Engineering & Population Control
Gender Election
To remove barriers to the services and programs people need, and foster safety and inclusiveness in provincial institutions and public spaces so that every can live with pride at every age and stage of their life, the party advocates:
– ensuring that all necessary medicines, are accessible to everyone who needs them, including all transition drugs and medication.
Contraception and Population Control
To eliminate inequities for women and ensure women have access to the same opportunities as men, the party advocates:
– making contraception free, so that cost is not a barrier to individuals’ ability to make choices about their reproductive health.

As of 23 February 2025, four days prior to the election it called, the party has published no comprehensive updated statement of its proposed policies.
In its 2024 Budget, the party states that:
– it proposes to expand palliative care services in local communities by adding up to 84 new adult beds and 12 pediatric beds, bringing the total to over 750, in order to provide people with comfort and dignity closer to their communities and loved ones when they are nearing the end of life.
The party has released no official statement concerning its policies on:
– abortion and alternatives
– medically assisted suicide and alternatives
– gender election or other forms of human engineering
– population control


Points to Ponder: The Sanctity of Human Life
A conscience well formed by the social teachings of the Church will seriously consider the following questions:
The Sanctity, Dignity and Meaning of Life, and Government Policy-Making Indexes
It is a sad fact that many of our parties, along with many of our voters, have stopped talking about or even acknowledging the evils of abortion, Socially-Assisted Death (SAD), and other sins against the sanctity of the body and the dignity of life. Is this because we as a society have been distracted by the comforts and worries of modern life, and lost touch with the purpose of life? Are we simply hiding, like the timid steward of Matthew 25:18?
And what of our governments? For years, many (probably most) of our political parties have been fond of asserting, in dozens of ways, that various groups of Canadians “deserve” or are “entitled to” a very wide variety of benefits in order to enable them (us) to live lives of dignity. They seem more reluctant, however, to explain what they mean by a “dignified” life, or to offer any way of measuring the effect of the benefits they propose for improving it. Indeed, the only indexes used by most governments to gauge wellness of any kind are gross domestic production levels (GDP) – the aggregate worth of the material objects our society produces. This has caused many observers to remark that Canada and other parts of the world appear to have lost any common conception of the proper meaning of the dignity or purpose of life, replacing that common conception its accompanying sense of community, shared culture, and a sense of the common good with an obsessive consumerism and pursuit of comfort and material wealth. All sense of civil community and our obligation to serve that common good suffers as well. The result has been a postmodern individualism that leaves human beings feeling isolated and on their own.
In his encyclical Fratelli tutti, Pope Francis observed that:
Today, in many countries, hyperbole, extremism and polarization have become political tools. Employing a strategy of ridicule, suspicion and relentless criticism, in a variety of ways one denies the right of others to exist or to have an opinion. Their share of the truth and their values are rejected and, as a result, the life of society is impoverished and subjected to the hubris of the powerful. Political life no longer has to do with healthy debates about long-term plans to improve people’s lives and to advance the common good, but only with slick marketing techniques primarily aimed at discrediting others. In this craven exchange of charges and counter-charges, debate degenerates into a permanent state of disagreement and confrontation.
Recently some parties have begun to propose various “wellness” indicators as an alternative to reliance on GDP in gauging social wellbeing. Such indicators are based on factors said to represent the health, happiness, and well-being of society and its individual members. And in 2019 the current Canadian Federal government quietly introduced a new “Quality of Life” measure in its instructions to new cabinet ministers, and caused the creation of a “Quality of Life Hub”. The Hub introduces the index, a draft method for measuring it, and solicits public feedback. (See https://www160.statcan.gc.ca/index-eng.htm)
1) Bearing in mind that it is citizen voters who are ultimately responsible for the behaviour of democratic governments, how should Catholics respond to the government’s call for comment, with properly and prayerfully-formed consciences? Should they involve their provincial and municipal governments in the discussion? If so, how?
How do the following questions, and their answers, factor into the government’s proposed framework? How do they relate to life and politics in the Province of Ontario?
2) What limits should be placed on voluntary termination of human life, either prior to birth or at any time before death? What can or should be done at the federal level, and what should be left to the provinces, or to private, religious, or other non-profit organizations?
3) What options is our society able to offer to reluctant or unwilling mothers, as alternatives to abortion and to support unwanted children?
4) Is it appropriate to allow minors to consider suicide as a health care option without consulting their parents?
5) What options can be offered by provincial or federal governments to families of minors who are being encouraged to consider medically-assisted suicide?
6) Is it appropriate to require unwilling healthcare personnel to participate in SAD, abortion, or other actions that are contrary to Catholic belief, or to their individual well-formed consciences? Should such persons be legally protected from performing tasks that go against their conscience? If so, how and to what extent?
7) To what extent should voluntary, elective services that are morally questionable to large numbers of individuals, such as the voluntary termination of life or the voluntary “modification” of gender, be financed publicly through mandatory taxation? If such services are to be offered, should they be financed by the individuals who elect to access them, or by sympathetic charities, or by dissenting taxpayers?
8) All national political parties have called for continued commitment to the fight against the evil of human trafficking. What more, if anything, could be done to fight this evil, at the personal, local, civic, municipal, and provincial levels to protect vulnerable people? Are you able to recognize the signs of trafficking? If activity that you felt included human trafficking came to your attention, what could or should you do about it?